The Monster Study was a stuttering experiment performed on 22 orphan childrenorphan childrenAn orphan (from the Greek: ορφανός, romanized: orphanós) is a child whose parents have died, are unknown, or have permanently abandoned them. In common usage, only a child who has lost both parents due to death is called an orphan.https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › OrphanOrphan - Wikipedia in Davenport, Iowa in 1939. Half of the children received positive speech therapy, praising the fluency of their speech, and the other half, negative speech therapy, belittling the children for speech imperfections.
What was the hypothesis of the Monster Study?
Results of the Study Tudor concluded that her findings supported the hypothesis that “evaluative labeling can influence behavior” (Tudor 1939). A few months after Tudor left the orphanage, the orphanage contacted her to voice their concerns about the children's speech.
Did the Monster Study have informed consent?
The Monster study is speech impediment experiment that was done on the children that lived in the orphanage. This study violated a lot of ethical issues because the children were psychological harm, informed consent was not given and the subjects were deceived.
What was Wendell Johnson's theory?
The diagnosogenic (semantogenic) theory for the onset of stuttering was initially proposed by Wendell Johnson in the early 1940s. It suggested that calling attention to a child's normal hesitations (repetitions) could precipitate stuttering (Bloodstein, 1987).
Was the Monster Study ethical or unethical?
Many speech experts and therapists agree the experiment was highly unethical by today's standards, but not necessarily by the standards of the day. And they say the case has done little to diminish Johnson's pioneering achievements.Aug 6, 2003
What did the Monster Study teach us?
The Monster Study was conducted by Dr. Wendell Johnson (a speech pathologist) to learn more about why children developed a stutter. Johnson developed the Monster Study to see if stuttering was a result of learned behavior or Biology, however there are many ethical problems with the study.
What was the result of the Monster Study?
Nothing in the study indicated any of the subjects became stutterers. But researchers concluded that those in the negative therapy group showed a loss of self-esteem and other detrimental effects seen in adult stutterers.Aug 6, 2003
Was the Monster Study successful?
Despite the researcher's good intentions, the study fails on any number of ethical dimensions. The children were never told they had been involved in a study, until it was revealed by a newspaper over 60 years later. Because of this some argue the damage inflicted on the children was even more unethical.